<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do You Keep the Gates Closed when the Gatekeeper Loses the Keys?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strangelyperfect.tv/2459/how-do-you-keep-the-gates-closed-when-the-gatekeeper-loses-the-keys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strangelyperfect.tv/2459/how-do-you-keep-the-gates-closed-when-the-gatekeeper-loses-the-keys/</link>
	<description>This is Our World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:03:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strangely</title>
		<link>http://strangelyperfect.tv/2459/how-do-you-keep-the-gates-closed-when-the-gatekeeper-loses-the-keys/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Strangely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangelyperfect.tv/?p=2459#comment-959</guid>
		<description>In yet another example of the gatekeeper losing the keys, this time it&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.siteadvisor.com/&quot;&gt;Site Advisor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.  This was bought by MacAfee a while back and is an aggreggator for dodgy sites.
So far so good, you may think.  You click on a hyperlink, SiteAdvisor then alerts the browser that it&#039;s good or bad.

However, Mark Edwards in an article for &lt;a href=&quot;http://windowssecrets.com/comp/090212/#story1&quot;&gt;Windows Secrets Newsletter&lt;/a&gt; has highlighted the various ways that this simple-sounding technology breaks down.

And the prime reason is greed.



&lt;blockquote&gt;In the continuing search for profit, McAfee have cut support for the product so much that any changes can take &lt;strong&gt;a whole year to propagate&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This means that a nefarious person can set up a &#039;good&#039; site, get it checked by McAfee, then once they&#039;ve got the green light, redo the site completely with any malware and dodgy links they want to include whatever, safe and sound behind the green light of the Site Advisor checks, knowing full-well that no checks will be done for a year!

A security system is only as good as the weakest link in the chain - and this isn&#039;t very strong, at all!!!  Line &amp; Learn eh?  Live and Learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In yet another example of the gatekeeper losing the keys, this time it&#8217;s <strong><a href="http://www.siteadvisor.com/">Site Advisor</a></strong>.  This was bought by MacAfee a while back and is an aggreggator for dodgy sites.<br />
So far so good, you may think.  You click on a hyperlink, SiteAdvisor then alerts the browser that it&#8217;s good or bad.</p>
<p>However, Mark Edwards in an article for <a href="http://windowssecrets.com/comp/090212/#story1">Windows Secrets Newsletter</a> has highlighted the various ways that this simple-sounding technology breaks down.</p>
<p>And the prime reason is greed.</p>
<blockquote><p>In the continuing search for profit, McAfee have cut support for the product so much that any changes can take <strong>a whole year to propagate</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>This means that a nefarious person can set up a &#8216;good&#8217; site, get it checked by McAfee, then once they&#8217;ve got the green light, redo the site completely with any malware and dodgy links they want to include whatever, safe and sound behind the green light of the Site Advisor checks, knowing full-well that no checks will be done for a year!</p>
<p>A security system is only as good as the weakest link in the chain &#8211; and this isn&#8217;t very strong, at all!!!  Line &amp; Learn eh?  Live and Learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strangely</title>
		<link>http://strangelyperfect.tv/2459/how-do-you-keep-the-gates-closed-when-the-gatekeeper-loses-the-keys/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>Strangely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangelyperfect.tv/?p=2459#comment-955</guid>
		<description>These HackersBloggers are unstoppable!  I think they are working their way through every computer security vendor on the world...

Now, (today, 11 Feb 2009), they&#039;ve broken into F_Secure as seen in their posting here: &lt;span class=&quot;removed_link&quot; title=&quot;http://hackersblog.org/2009/02/11/f-securecom-sql-injection-cross-site-scripting/&quot;&gt;F-Secure.com - SQL Injection + Cross Site Scripting&lt;/span&gt;.
I was just thinking today, that the crown jewels for a hacker to hack has got to be the &lt;a ref=&quot;http://www.update.microsoft.com/&quot;&gt;Windows Update&lt;/a&gt; site.  Any malicious code dumped there would probably bring the world to a halt for a few days....
So I&#039;ll just watch and wait.  NOD32 next...or Symantech...or McAfee...or...

A nice comment has appeared &lt;a href=&quot;http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/11/updates-about-kaspersky-sql-injection/&quot; title =&quot;Updates about Kaspersky SQL injection&quot;&gt;here on this blogger&#039;s site, &quot;Security and the Net&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.  The blogger is a Dutch IT professional and says;


&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;It’s also a good reminder never to trust any code, whether it was produced in-house or by a contractor&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And that&#039;s my point - no security system, no work or creation of man is perfect, and for the UK Government to put all their paranoid security into one massive ID Cards basket, is just stupid.  Because it all runs on code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These HackersBloggers are unstoppable!  I think they are working their way through every computer security vendor on the world&#8230;</p>
<p>Now, (today, 11 Feb 2009), they&#8217;ve broken into F_Secure as seen in their posting here: <span class="removed_link" title="http://hackersblog.org/2009/02/11/f-securecom-sql-injection-cross-site-scripting/">F-Secure.com &#8211; SQL Injection + Cross Site Scripting</span>.<br />
I was just thinking today, that the crown jewels for a hacker to hack has got to be the <a ref="http://www.update.microsoft.com/">Windows Update</a> site.  Any malicious code dumped there would probably bring the world to a halt for a few days&#8230;.<br />
So I&#8217;ll just watch and wait.  NOD32 next&#8230;or Symantech&#8230;or McAfee&#8230;or&#8230;</p>
<p>A nice comment has appeared <a href="http://securityandthe.net/2009/02/11/updates-about-kaspersky-sql-injection/" title ="Updates about Kaspersky SQL injection">here on this blogger&#8217;s site, &#8220;Security and the Net&#8221;</a>.  The blogger is a Dutch IT professional and says;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It’s also a good reminder never to trust any code, whether it was produced in-house or by a contractor&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>And that&#8217;s my point &#8211; no security system, no work or creation of man is perfect, and for the UK Government to put all their paranoid security into one massive ID Cards basket, is just stupid.  Because it all runs on code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

