Fizzy Oceans Spell Doom

Orbiting Carbon ObservatoryAs an almost instananeous follow up (the interconnectedness of all things?) to my recent disappointment about the launch failure of the OCO satellite, the BBC, Guardian, Telegraph etc  have all been reporting some recent climate work from Plymouth.

An Italian Bay

There’s now so much CO2 being absorbed by the oceans that their pH is being significantly lowered.  A sea bay off Italy is giving us, in a microcosm,  a glimpse of real possible future conditions in the Earth’s oceans if the current accelerating rate of carbon dioxide climate forcing is continued.

The bay is volcanically located and CO2 bubbles up through the sea floor.  In all other respects, it’s a normal bit of the Mediterranean.  So it’s got a standard mix of fish, molluscs and vegetation, and the standard mix of predator-prey species.

Soft Limpet

Identified many years ago by Sir John Murray, the CCD is the ocean depth where dissolving calcium carbonate (like sea shells) matches the rate that calcium carbonate of either type (organic or non-organic) is deposited.  In the remote past it was very shallow and produced the huge beds of limestone and chalk like the white cliffs of Dover.  Or the Alps!  (the beds in the old Tethys Sea are over 30km thick!)

Now its quite a way down (over 4km!)

However, in the Italian bay, there’s so much CO2 that the sea is so acidic that it makes the CCD effectively zero!  The plants grow as a monoculture of sea grass on the abundant CO2.  The shell creatures (like limpets) can’t make their shells fast enough and they have no real protection.  Of course, for sea birds and similar predators, it’s a short term food bonanza.  But what happens when all the limpets are gobbled up and gone?  And what if you are a creature that can’t eat sea grass?

This, in a nutshell, is the problem we face with our whole world.  What will we eat when things don’t grow very well any more?  What will we do when we’ve gobbled up all our fossil fuels?

Related posts:
  1. The 26 Admonitions explained by Richard Causton Introduction I’ve nabbed the content of this from Ted Penfold. ...
  2. Future Energy Sources for Mankind. Here’s something (link now dead – originally at http://72.232.216.38/manahmanah/44990/Nuclear_I_spit_on_you.html? )...
  3. The True Meaning of Religion – Jet Fighters Today’s little mention on this news item here on The...
  4. Sarah Palin, the Most Loathsome Dog Don’t let Sarah Palin’s obvious organisational ability and her successful...
  5. EU Law Leaps Forward while UK flatfoots in Energy Wilderness Some wonderful news this week for people worried about the...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

  One Response to “This is Why We Needed the Orbiting Carbon Observatory Satellite”

  1. [...] This is Why We Needed the Orbiting Carbon Observatory Satellite [...]

 Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Powered by Sweet Captcha
Verify your real existence,
Drag some popcorn to the box
  • captcha
  • captcha
  • captcha
  • captcha

Attach a file Uploading File types: jpg, png, zip,pdf, Max size: 2Mbytes, Max count: 3
   
Use OpenDNS

© 2007-2012 Strangely Perfect All Rights Reserved