Continuing on From…  What Killed Flight AF 447

Air France A330-200

Since the search for the ‘black boxes’ of Flight 447 was abandoned a few days ago (20th Aug 2009 – see news item),  only 3 days later, Nature’s On-line version has published reports of the jet things I was going on about in my first article about my thoughts on the disaster.  A free synopsis is here:

Quantification of the troposphere-to-ionosphere charge transfer in a gigantic jet

The article points out the currently known differences between the various electrical strikes, or jets, but two common things are stated in the summary:

1. They all go upwards from the weather tops towards the edge of space.
2. They all have massive amounts of charge.

Gigantic jets can travel more than 60km (40 miles) into the ionosphere

Furthermore, the BBC has published a photo of this rarely seen phenomenon, “upwards lightning”.!

It turns out that the work (by Duke University), was done last year, but has only come to light in Nature today.

And Now?

For now, because there’s been no real extra evidence produced, jets or lightning strikes like this one (and others in the YouTube videos on my first article), I still think are a very good candidate for an explanation of the plane’s demise.

There are several reasons for this:

• 

  Air France Flight 447

  Several other planes were in the same area of the (large scale and not unusual) storms.  They were basically untroubled by the storms.

• The other planes  saw nothing (apart from one which saw a possible flash of an explosion), which only adds fuel to the elusive quality of these electrical discharges.
• This rarity of the strikes (as in the recent image above), coupled to their speed, all helps to confirm that if such a strike happened, it would be unlikely to have been seen.
• The recent Duke research proves that such a strike, would be very powerful.
• Modern planes are tested for many eventualities.  But a rare, high-power bolt of energy, is, by definition, very hard to test against.  Probably, the only way it could be done, would be to wheel a plane to a high power underground physics lab – but could it fit? !!
• 

  AF447 Rudder

  The plane crashed into the sea almost certainly in one piece (i.e. – no air break-up) because ,

  • unlike some other air-break-up crashes, the passenger bodies were not seriously damaged by a high-speed blast of air and rapid decompression.
  • large pieces of the aircraft were found – high altitude break-ups normally increase fragmentation and the bits aren’t large
  • the tail-fin damage proves it was attached when the plane hit the water
• Apart from garbled radio alerts from the confused auto system, there were no human alerts from the crew of any kind…. ?    This means that either,
  • all of the crew were very busy
  • all (or most) of the crew were incapacitated
  • none of the normal communication systems worked
• This suggests, to me, that the plane went into a flat spin or shallow dive, but not so extravagant as to snap the wings, tail or fuselage.
• Coupled to the lack of messages, it suggests that most, if not all, electrical systems were dead.
  • It also suggests that the auto reporting system was more robust and had an independent power supply – which is true.  It, however, was getting duff information from the plane’s sensors, hence the garbled and conflicting automatic radio reports.
• This all suggests a massive electrical strike, so fast and rare that no-one else in the area saw it.
  • If this incapacitated the crew, no-one is saying…  the reports I’ve read make no mention.

Ergo, upwards lightning, a blue jet or some other similar thing, but just enough to incapacitate the plane and most of it’s electrics…

Flat Spin

There’s an interesting video below, of a trained fighter pilot (arguably more proficient and clear-headed than an airline pilot), flying an F14 Tomcat into a flat spin.

The pilot says virtually nothing, even though comms were working.  The plane just spins and spins, dropping 15,000 feet until the guy bales out.

But notice how the plane does not break up in ‘flight’….

Q. So what does it mean?

A. It means the F14 was notorious for this and that even the best of pilots get spun into speechless confusion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7VS9_Ce0sg

• More details surrounding suspected Airplane Terrorist: Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab [/caption] What We Know About Terror Suspect December 26th, 2009, 12:52 PM UTC We have...
• Free Ebook: "Practical Mental Influence" by William Walker Atkinson - FREE Download! The secret of Mental Concentration lies in the control of the Attention.  And the control...
• Global Warming Global Warming "With public sentiment nothing can fail; without it nothing can succeed. Consequently, he...
• Diesel Electric Hybrid Vehicles: An Evolution in Hybrid Vehicles Diesel power plays a vital role in the development of one of today's most important...
• Pyle Supreme Waterproof Audio System Package for Car/Truck/Vehicle/Boat, In-dash CD/DVD/AM-FM/Video Receiver with Built in 3" Color Monitor -- PLCM22IR Rear View Camera with Night Vision -- 6 Channel 2000w Bridgeable Mosfet Amplifier -- High Quality Radio Wire Antenna -- 280w 7.7" 2 Way Speakers -- 250w 6.5" 2-way Custom Component System -- 8" 300w 2-way White Wake Board Speakers -- Two 12" 1000w White Subwoofers PLDMR3U: DVD/VCD/MPEG4/CD/CD-R/CDRW Compatible Receiver, TFT Color Monitor, On Screen DisplayPLCM22IR: Rear View Camera, Night Vision...
• Glossary: Hybrid Car Technology Hybrid cars are gaining in popularity and this is leading people to want to know...
• 10 Things Your Airline Won't Tell You [/caption] Updated and adapted from the book "1,001 Things They Won't Tell You: An Insider's...

Related Posts by Tags

• Flight AF 447 Ocean Floor (0)
• Obama, BBC China sniping and Guantanamo First Act (2)
• Buddhism (1)