<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Headphones and Mikes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strangelyperfect.tv/71/headphones-and-mikes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strangelyperfect.tv/71/headphones-and-mikes/</link>
	<description>This is Our World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:03:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strangely</title>
		<link>http://strangelyperfect.tv/71/headphones-and-mikes/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Strangely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangelyperfect.tv/?p=71#comment-38</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve looked at an AKG tube and it seems okay but too much dosh for me.  Apart from that, I&#039;ve a built-in caution for anything including valves as I got a really bad shock from a valve radio when I was 14. The main advantages of a valve as an amp are the exceedingly high input impedance which doesn&#039;t load the source (like plugging a bass guitar into a valve amp, there&#039;s no string dampening from the amp.  This is because the input is the grid in the valve which sits in a vacuum (hence the name) and electricity doesn&#039;t go very well in a vacuum which is the definition of high impedance.  Overloading the valve input produces even harmonics which sound nice to the ear unlike the odd ones.  (  If you want to know where these terms come from you&#039;ll have to look up Fourier Analysis.  Fourier was a French mathematician bloke around about the time of the French Revolution, I think.).  This comes from the motion of electrons in the vacuum, but I&#039;ve forgotten how!  Under overload conditions, the valve doesn&#039;t get thermal runaway like a silicon counterpart might. The disadvantages are the extra (high voltage and cathode heater) power supplies needed, the fragility of the valve, the valve wears out (as electrons boil off the cathode) and needs replacing frequently, the large size compared to semiconductor equivalents(the biggest valve in common use is the old fashioned TV screen!), the high voltage is dangerous when servicing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve looked at an AKG tube and it seems okay but too much dosh for me.  Apart from that, I&#8217;ve a built-in caution for anything including valves as I got a really bad shock from a valve radio when I was 14. The main advantages of a valve as an amp are the exceedingly high input impedance which doesn&#8217;t load the source (like plugging a bass guitar into a valve amp, there&#8217;s no string dampening from the amp.  This is because the input is the grid in the valve which sits in a vacuum (hence the name) and electricity doesn&#8217;t go very well in a vacuum which is the definition of high impedance.  Overloading the valve input produces even harmonics which sound nice to the ear unlike the odd ones.  (  If you want to know where these terms come from you&#8217;ll have to look up Fourier Analysis.  Fourier was a French mathematician bloke around about the time of the French Revolution, I think.).  This comes from the motion of electrons in the vacuum, but I&#8217;ve forgotten how!  Under overload conditions, the valve doesn&#8217;t get thermal runaway like a silicon counterpart might. The disadvantages are the extra (high voltage and cathode heater) power supplies needed, the fragility of the valve, the valve wears out (as electrons boil off the cathode) and needs replacing frequently, the large size compared to semiconductor equivalents(the biggest valve in common use is the old fashioned TV screen!), the high voltage is dangerous when servicing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strangely</title>
		<link>http://strangelyperfect.tv/71/headphones-and-mikes/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Strangely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangelyperfect.tv/?p=71#comment-39</guid>
		<description>The 990 pros should be more accurate than the 250&#039;s as they are open back. The impedance is 250ohms so they will appear quiet to an amp designed to pump into 60ohm load say. But they are really flat which is what you want, with a really wide freq response. They may not be too good when recording a vocalist alone though as there will be bleed-thru onto the mike because of the open construction. Your 250&#039;s could do for that as Beyer say they are for studio playbacks and intercoms but the response is 10-30,000Hz which seems a bit over the top for that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 990 pros should be more accurate than the 250&#8242;s as they are open back. The impedance is 250ohms so they will appear quiet to an amp designed to pump into 60ohm load say. But they are really flat which is what you want, with a really wide freq response. They may not be too good when recording a vocalist alone though as there will be bleed-thru onto the mike because of the open construction. Your 250&#8242;s could do for that as Beyer say they are for studio playbacks and intercoms but the response is 10-30,000Hz which seems a bit over the top for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://strangelyperfect.tv/71/headphones-and-mikes/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangelyperfect.tv/?p=71#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Forgot to say, I have a pair of AKG 301s too. But I dont like them as there seems to be a lift in the bass region and they definetely dont seem too accurate across the board
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to say, I have a pair of AKG 301s too. But I dont like them as there seems to be a lift in the bass region and they definetely dont seem too accurate across the board<br />
:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strangely</title>
		<link>http://strangelyperfect.tv/71/headphones-and-mikes/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Strangely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangelyperfect.tv/?p=71#comment-32</guid>
		<description>The SE looks good but is pricey.  Most of the time I don&#039;t think the switched pattern would be of use.  This is a dump of the SE and a rode nt1 next to each other, but the rode is a third of the price.  You&#039;ll see that the rode also has really low noise output and greater sensitivity.  This means to get a given electrical output from a quiet sound, the RODE gives more with less background hiss.  They both claim to have a warm sound etc with similar specs in other respects.  Have a look at the Beyer ribbon mikes like the M88, M160, M260 which are all excellent at acoustics, vocals AND bass drum of all things!&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;ll have a look at some AKGs next.  The AKG 171 looked okay as a headphone, spec-wise as did the Beyer DT990 pro and you won&#039;t get as deaf as with the Sennheiser you bought!

Rees
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SE looks good but is pricey.  Most of the time I don&#8217;t think the switched pattern would be of use.  This is a dump of the SE and a rode nt1 next to each other, but the rode is a third of the price.  You&#8217;ll see that the rode also has really low noise output and greater sensitivity.  This means to get a given electrical output from a quiet sound, the RODE gives more with less background hiss.  They both claim to have a warm sound etc with similar specs in other respects.  Have a look at the Beyer ribbon mikes like the M88, M160, M260 which are all excellent at acoustics, vocals AND bass drum of all things!<br />
I&#8217;ll have a look at some AKGs next.  The AKG 171 looked okay as a headphone, spec-wise as did the Beyer DT990 pro and you won&#8217;t get as deaf as with the Sennheiser you bought!</p>
<p>Rees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://strangelyperfect.tv/71/headphones-and-mikes/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangelyperfect.tv/?p=71#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Exactly, or a sine sweep from 20hz - 20 khz, this will better capture the full range of frequencies. You can take impulses of all kinds of equipment too. Like pre amp, compressors, eq and even tape Paul&amp;lt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, or a sine sweep from 20hz &#8211; 20 khz, this will better capture the full range of frequencies. You can take impulses of all kinds of equipment too. Like pre amp, compressors, eq and even tape Paul&#038;lt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strangely</title>
		<link>http://strangelyperfect.tv/71/headphones-and-mikes/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Strangely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangelyperfect.tv/?p=71#comment-30</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So I suppose a good way to get it would be to let off a starting&lt;br /&gt;
pistol in a church while recording the sound with a good omni-mike and&lt;br /&gt;
then chop the bang off the front so you&#039;ve just got the echoes and&lt;br /&gt;
then stick that through your processor so that the dsp chip thingy&lt;br /&gt;
emulates it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rees&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I suppose a good way to get it would be to let off a starting<br />
pistol in a church while recording the sound with a good omni-mike and<br />
then chop the bang off the front so you&#8217;ve just got the echoes and<br />
then stick that through your processor so that the dsp chip thingy<br />
emulates it.</p>
<p>Rees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://strangelyperfect.tv/71/headphones-and-mikes/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangelyperfect.tv/?p=71#comment-29</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Its basically the sonic imprint of the reverberation of a space(ie&lt;br /&gt;
church or hallway). With a piece of software you can then use it as&lt;br /&gt;
reverb effect on a sound. It then sound like the sound was recorded in&lt;br /&gt;
that space. It has to do with the frequencies in that space. If they&lt;br /&gt;
are multiplied, not reflected etc etc Pau lo fi&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its basically the sonic imprint of the reverberation of a space(ie<br />
church or hallway). With a piece of software you can then use it as<br />
reverb effect on a sound. It then sound like the sound was recorded in<br />
that space. It has to do with the frequencies in that space. If they<br />
are multiplied, not reflected etc etc Pau lo fi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strangely</title>
		<link>http://strangelyperfect.tv/71/headphones-and-mikes/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Strangely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangelyperfect.tv/?p=71#comment-28</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know what you mean by the term &quot;impulse response&quot;. What&#039;s it&lt;br /&gt;
to do with.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yours Lo-Fi-ly&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rees&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what you mean by the term &#8220;impulse response&#8221;. What&#8217;s it<br />
to do with.</p>
<p>Yours Lo-Fi-ly</p>
<p>Rees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://strangelyperfect.tv/71/headphones-and-mikes/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangelyperfect.tv/?p=71#comment-27</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Cool. I was thinking about doing something with piezzo pick-ups. But&lt;br /&gt;
once again wouldnt know where to start. Also if you see any cheap reel&lt;br /&gt;
to reel recorders or drum sets(kick, snare, hi-hat)for a bout £40 let&lt;br /&gt;
me know. Also are you familiar with impulse responses? Because of&lt;br /&gt;
these Im looking for a portable cassette recorder with a built in&lt;br /&gt;
stereo mic. I bought a Hi MD minidisc on ebay for £20 which can record&lt;br /&gt;
wav&#039;s to a 1GB mini disk and I bought for £7 a stereo amplifier with 2&lt;br /&gt;
electret mics kit. I have to build it and I also have to make a&lt;br /&gt;
balanced connection for it and change the electret mic positioning so&lt;br /&gt;
they cross over each other. I want the cassette recorder fo that lo fi&lt;br /&gt;
sound All fun stuff Paul&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. I was thinking about doing something with piezzo pick-ups. But<br />
once again wouldnt know where to start. Also if you see any cheap reel<br />
to reel recorders or drum sets(kick, snare, hi-hat)for a bout £40 let<br />
me know. Also are you familiar with impulse responses? Because of<br />
these Im looking for a portable cassette recorder with a built in<br />
stereo mic. I bought a Hi MD minidisc on ebay for £20 which can record<br />
wav&#8217;s to a 1GB mini disk and I bought for £7 a stereo amplifier with 2<br />
electret mics kit. I have to build it and I also have to make a<br />
balanced connection for it and change the electret mic positioning so<br />
they cross over each other. I want the cassette recorder fo that lo fi<br />
sound All fun stuff Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strangely</title>
		<link>http://strangelyperfect.tv/71/headphones-and-mikes/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Strangely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangelyperfect.tv/?p=71#comment-26</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for that Paul. I&#039;ll have a look as I&#039;m much better with&lt;br /&gt;
plots and figures than manuf. brochures! However, making a mic&lt;br /&gt;
element is a different kettle of fish - especially ribbon ones.&lt;br /&gt;
They are put together by people wearing fully enclosed suits so&lt;br /&gt;
that there&#039;s no dust to drop in the magnetic gap and also so that&lt;br /&gt;
the person doesn&#039;t breathe on the ribbon, which would snap or&lt;br /&gt;
crumple in the teeniest gust of air!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Funnily enough, the guitarist in my old band worked for a time in&lt;br /&gt;
Rock City, Newcastle which is a music shop, but he worked in the workshop,&lt;br /&gt;
usually fixing ac30s and marshall amps which was usually a new valve&lt;br /&gt;
and a squirt of servisol! However, he did &quot;aquire&quot; a box of shure mike&lt;br /&gt;
elements, mainly smIIIs and Ivs. All we did was solder some wires,&lt;br /&gt;
stick them into bog roll inners and then the whole drum kit was really&lt;br /&gt;
cheaply miked up! We couldn&#039;t use them for vocals though as there were&lt;br /&gt;
no pop filters or grilles or anything, but it was great on the drums;&lt;br /&gt;
I had them everywhere!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rees&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Paul. I&#8217;ll have a look as I&#8217;m much better with<br />
plots and figures than manuf. brochures! However, making a mic<br />
element is a different kettle of fish &#8211; especially ribbon ones.<br />
They are put together by people wearing fully enclosed suits so<br />
that there&#8217;s no dust to drop in the magnetic gap and also so that<br />
the person doesn&#8217;t breathe on the ribbon, which would snap or<br />
crumple in the teeniest gust of air!</p>
<p>Funnily enough, the guitarist in my old band worked for a time in<br />
Rock City, Newcastle which is a music shop, but he worked in the workshop,<br />
usually fixing ac30s and marshall amps which was usually a new valve<br />
and a squirt of servisol! However, he did &#8220;aquire&#8221; a box of shure mike<br />
elements, mainly smIIIs and Ivs. All we did was solder some wires,<br />
stick them into bog roll inners and then the whole drum kit was really<br />
cheaply miked up! We couldn&#8217;t use them for vocals though as there were<br />
no pop filters or grilles or anything, but it was great on the drums;<br />
I had them everywhere!</p>
<p>Rees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

