Monthly Archives:July 2008

House Prices – It’s not that bad you know!

You have to be careful with statistics.

(especially when you are trying to deceive!)

The graph shown at the left appears on the BBC website alongside the panic and doom inducing headline; UK house price fall ‘at a record’.  It was repeated many times, even on national TV news on all stations.

The thing is that statistics can be used to prove virtually anything, and the graph at the left really does look pretty bad – if you’re a home-owner, or pretty good – if you’re looking to buy for the first time.

However, I’ve checked one of the data sources, The Halifax one, to see the real trend – the real numbers.

And Here They Are!

(now see the truth!)

The red line is average house prices since 1983 and the blue line is the annual month-on-month change in those prices.

HalifaxHousePriceIndex.jpg

What we clearly see is something quite different to the chart on the BBC website and elsewhere.

The blue line is the equivalent to the lines on the BBC website.  It doesn’t look so gloom laden now, does it?  In fact the worst bit of the blue line was in 1989 when Thatcher was still in power!

The bit that the media is using to keep the population in a state of dire anxiety is the teeny little fall on the blue line at the right hand end!  That is the only bit that’s shown in the top chart!

The red line (actual house prices) shows a nice steady rise all the way through the current labour government’s tenure until the little recent fall.  This is wholly outside the government’s control and yet they are mysteriously been blamed for it and somehow are supposed to fix it, saving people’s embarrassment about their profligate recent over-spending!

Halifax House Price Index

Halifax House Price Index

Opens Excel Worked Data

For those with excel, the link is for a downloadable spreadsheet with the chart above embedded into the Halifax’s source data.  It’s the real thing – decide the truth for yourself!

Strangely Perfect made it.

Comments are closed

Why Buy Vista – the HP View

Following on from my post http://strangelyperfect.tv/442/why-buy-vista/, I’ve noticed that Hewlett Packard have now put some of their stats into the public domain which refute the Microsoft notion that Vista sales are whizz-bang and superb.

This posting, http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/215502/hp-windows-xp-accounts-for-majority-of-vista-sales.html, reports the fact that Microsoft is double-counting sales of Vista and XP because customers are getting new machines with XP installed as a downgrade option for Vista – and then doing the downgrade!   It’s got to be the first time in history when a downgrade is an improvement!

On top of this, consider Microsoft’s pricing structure, which should seriously dent anyone’s aspirations to acquire XP over Vista……

Novatech on this page, http://www.novatech.co.uk/novatech/products/a731x1y0z1p0s0n0m0, has these prices for Operating Systems (32 bit shown here).  It’s representative for the UK.  OEM prices are shown – no-one in their right mind pays full whack.

OS Price (UK)
Windows XP Home OEM Service Pack 2

Manufacturer Code: N09-02030 3pk plit to 1

£59.92 inc vat
Windows XP PRO OEM Service Pack 2
Manufacturer Code: E85-04914 3PK SPLIT
£95.17 inc vat
Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium 32-Bit Edition DVD – OEM – 1Pk

Manufacturer Code: 661-00752 3pk split to 1

£69.33 inc vat
Microsoft Windows Vista Business 32-Bit Edition DVD – OEM – 1Pk
Manufacturer Code: 66J-02289
£89.30 inc vat

What this shows that for comparable systems (XP Pro versus Vista Home Basic), Microsoft is setting their price structure to push the Vista product.  The cheapest Vista isn’t worth talking about as any user who’s bought it will tell you, the much vaunted aero interface doesn’t work with it!  The Business edition has some extra network stuff, but most businesses don’t get it as the HP experience proves….

So what we have is the classic lies, damned lies and statistics effect.  Microsift is using dubious statistics to push their line that Vista is okay whereas people would rather have the 95 quid product over the 70 quid one!

Comments are closed

Crawling Chaos – Neil Young – Sound Quality

I had a message from Doomage recently which allowed me to update some biographical information on the Crawling Chaos website here, http://crawlingchaos.co.uk/myths/people, but also he expressed his disappointment about the online sound quality.

Needles to say, I agree with the sentiment but am forced into this mode by the technical limitations of the medium.

But at least we are in sound company.  Neil Young, the godfather of grunge has piped up with a similar statement at a recent tech conference where he stated:

The iPod is a “Fisher Price toy”reported in Computer Buyer Magazine

He also doesn’t like CDs which gets my vote as well but for different reasons, I think.  Whatever, it’s all a reaction to the throwaway garbage mentality to much modern music.  Everywhere you go there’s the same crap pumped out so that no-one actually notices it any more and thus, it’s disposable.

I went into Halfords yesterday to get some wipers and screenwash – there it was; booga-booga-chik, booga-booga-chik

A car drove past; booga-booga-chik, booga-booga-chik

In a lift in Croydon recently; booga-booga-chik, booga-booga-chik

And because the music is disposable it’s treated by people as if it’s free.  It doesn’t help that most stuff is produced in tiny separate sound boxes of the audio spectrum which allows huge amounts of compression at both production and dissemination to be used.  As soon as an artist tries to use overlapping sound and making the most of the spectrum, massive audio artifacts start to rear their head – and this is what Neil and Doomage are spotting.

I even noticed it in a simple news TV broadcast on digital yesterday on 5.  The audio artefacts are becoming more obvious – presumably because the technicians in charge are so inured to the crap sound in their iPods that they don’t hear the artefacts anymore! Much like two people trying to converse in an airport – after a while they don’t notice the jet noise!

It’s a kind of metallic bubbling noise.

Checking up Vince Clarke yesterday, I see that he spotted a similar thing some time ago in the way he did his synth pop stuff.  He found that his old analogue synths which took ages to wire up still had a better sound than the mechanical MIDI which followed.  I think his ears had an early appreciation of what would later become compression artefacts.

This is all part of the interconnectedness of all things.  Each notionally separate cause is having profoundly bigger and interactive effects far from the original intent.  We see how engineering solutions to data transmission affect society’s appreciation of music and how one man’s music “noise” (Neil Young, Crawling Chaos), is actually degraded by compression effects.  We see how people adapt to the new sounds designed to fit into the compressed format and we see how artists create and perform within these constraints.

Hopefully, the next step is that we can all agree that MySpace is the New Hell and is for washed up wannabees to wank into the wind.

But that’s for another day.

Comments are closed

Fine The Perpetrator, not the Organisation

Strangely post on July 30th, 2008
Posted in Freedom Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

In my capacity at work, if I steal something from a member of the public while they are on site, I’d get interviewed by the police and prosecuted under the law of the land.

Bizarrely, in TV land they don’t work to our laws.  If they steal from the public, the company gets fined by a “Watchdog”!!!

BBC fined £400,000 over phone-ins is the latest abomination of justice.  Here’s the sequence of events:

  • BBC boss says “make a show”
  • BBC boss says “Make more money”
  • BBC staff say “How?”
  • BBC boss says “Charge people for phone calls even if competitions are finished or there isn’t one or if the winner is pre-determined!”
  • BBC staff say “OK”
  • Someone finds out
  • BBC say sorry, whatever that means.  How can an organisation say sorry!
  • Not good enough, says the Watchdog.  We’ll have £400,000.  (How do they choose this figure and how can one publicly funded body fine another?)

Conclusion

  • So the BBC is funded by the licence payer
  • So in effect, we pay the fine ourselves (it’s about 3p each)
  • The BBC boss keeps making shows and promises to be good.

Recommendation

No.  No.  No.

The boss ordered a THEFT, just like an East End gang boss.  They stole millions, just like an East End Gang boss.

The BBC (and ITV) boss for each show that instigated the theft should be prosecuted under common law. They gained (or intended to gain) from their actions.  Presumably making profits is high up on the CV criteria and they’d be looking for bonuses and promotions and/or new contracts.  So they gained in quite material ways.

Prosecute individuals. It’s the only way to make corporations act ethically.  The fact that BBC bosses took a bonus cut (!) is immaterial.  They should be prosecuted for theft and have a big chunk taken from their salary not a piddling cut in bonus.

The whole thing stinks and the disparate way that the law is applied in this country is a disgrace to honour.  Shame on the whole fucking lot of them.

Prosecute the Watchdog for incompetence.  If a farmer has a guard dog that doesn’t do it’s job, it’s put down because it’s plainly useless.  Same with OfCom.  This “affair” went on for two years.  What are they playing at?

© 2007-2013 Strangely Perfect All Rights Reserved