(This posting originally released on 16 Dec 2007. Reposted and edited because of the subject’s death.)
Claire and Tereska
This is a BBC News article on the women of the French Resistance who worked with De Gaulle in London and then went to Paris with him for the Liberation.
Tereska and Claire visit de Gaulle's headquarters in London
Claire is one of our local SGI Buddhist group and she has told me many stories of those times. Recently she was musing on what she would have done and what would have happened to her if they she’d been asked to join SOE (like some were) and be dropped in France (because of her good French etc).
She also mentioned about a sniper’s bullet aimed at De Gaulle that just missed him (and her) while he walked down the Champs Elysée but hit a young man from their London party who had had a premonition that he’d die if he went back to France with them.
I must ask her if it’d be okay to write more of this down for her (and us). She’s eighty odd, you know.
Postscript Added 28/6/2010
Claire died this week, peacefully, with her family around her, in France. Bravo for her big, big, life. Too late to ask any more questions….
Information on her wartime exploits can be found here:
I’ve been thinking about the perilous mentality of the 52% of Americans who think torture is all fine and dandy. And then I saw a neat little video piece on the BBC this morning which casts a few French people in the exact same spots in June 1944 and now. It’s here: D-Day in France:...
Coroner and Law I’m often struck when reading the papers or news, to see the coroner’s verdict on someone’s death as: Ending his own life while the balance of his mind was disturbed Well they have to say something, it’s their job, but the phrase is very peculiar. Take this couple, the Milners, who were...
The home secretary faces the threat of more scientists resigning after sacking his chief drugs adviser Prof David Nutt for his comments about cannabis policy. Two members of the drugs advisory panel have quit in protest and others are to meet to discuss their next move. Alan Johnson said Prof Nutt was sacked for “crossing the line” between giving advice and campaigning for a policy.
The point is that there’s a conflict between safety, facts, opinions, freedom, freedom of speech, duty, duty of care, education, class and knowledge.
Currently, a few tens of people each year die while taking ecstasy. Most actually die from dehydration and related effects, not from the drug.
However, the drug is addictive in that it’s effects diminish with repetition and the user has to take more each time to obtain the same experience.
It can be argued that taking one drug leads to taking others, which seems a reasonable supposition. But even so, the deaths due to drug taking, as opposed to the deaths due to crimes within the drugs supply industry are miniscule.
Far better would be to fully legalise all drugs but to have life imprisonment for illegal supply. In this way, there’s be nothing to stop ‘curious’ people making their own drugs…
An even better, and logical proposition, would be to focus on preventable deaths as they stand in the real, accountable figures. Start by checking the official government death statistics… Oh! And here they are (it’s a big PDF file)
In this right-riveting read are all sorts of weirdness.
For instance, the number of deaths from CYSTITIS is greater than those due to those surrounding Ecstasy intake!! Perhaps we should be focussing our energies here?
But even more shocking, is that the deaths due to NOT WEARING A CRASH HELMET while driving a CAR are more than Ecstasy and Cystitis combined.
If HM Gov were truly concerned about the welfare of it’s citizens, they would insist on the use of crash helmets now and also make it impossible for motor vehicles to exceed ANY speed limit by the use of automatic speed limiting devices? Maybe install equipment to prevent vehicle movement if there’s alcohol on the driver’s breath?
But that removes the freedom of a person to drive how they like? – is the obvious riposte. And why should I have to wear a helmet inside my car? And if I want to drive while drunk, that’s my choice!
So? And there we are back to my first statement: “The point is that there’s a conflict between safety, facts, opinions, freedom, freedom of speech, duty, duty of care, education, class and knowledge.”
And in that, the scientist is absolutely right and Johnson has chucked away all ‘fair comment’ values of a free society and ended the debate by shooting the messenger. Meanwhile the carnage on the streets continues both by vehicle and by the gun and knife.
Either way, it’s still carnage – and deaths from Ecstasy are a pimple in comparison.
Freedom and the Law In stark contrast to the US which still insists on draconian measures against people thought to be bad (the lowest of the low Rumsfeld called them), the UK has had a landmark ruling for common sense in a democratic, freedom-loving country. Nine Law Lords have unanimously ruled it was unfair for...
Comparing The West and The East There is currently a world-wide flu epidemic and it’s interesting to compare the responses of various countries to it, with the historical pandemic of The Plague, i.e. the Black Death. Flu In the USA, it’s been called “Mexican Flu” sometimes quite pejoratively, especially at it’s outset and especially by...
I got a ping this morning from a website called cleanup-registry.net It arrived because I’d been referenced as a website in the network setup using the plugin, “Related Websites” by the Blog Traffic Exchange (actually, it may be time to knock this experiment on the head as generally, the sites are only loosely related and have poor linkage otherwise).
Whatever; the link referenced an old post of mine about Microsoft software problems here. Notionally, the website looks okay and professional – but I smelled a rat!
This is a screenshot of the whole post (at http://cleanup-registry.net/need-major-help-problem-installing-net-35-framework/). So I did a search on the user’s error message:
‘The DOTNETFX35SETUP.EXE file is linked to missing export NTDLL.DLL:NtShutdownSystem.’ (it turns out later that I should have just done a search on the text in the first paragraph of the post…)
About six entries down in the Google search results, is this page from the respected ‘Yahoo! Answers’ forums website, shown at left.
The screen-shots of each WILL blow up to full-size, but to save you making direct textual comparisons, let me tell you now that the text in both, and one comment, the accepted answer in Yahoo! Answers, is EXACTLY the same!
For your interest, the accepted answer is that the OS’s are incompatible and there’s a fix described.
The real problem is the dates! cleanup-registry.net’s is the 8th September 2009; Yahoo! Answer’s is from 8 months ago!
What we are seeing is the same sort of tactic employed by the Google Treasure Chest scammers of a fake blog (now called a flog!) being used as part of a selling campaign. They’ve content-scraped decent content and passed it off as their own as a means of justifying their flogging area.
Q. Their product?
A. They are trying to sell a registry cleaner type software and a computer maintenance service ($25 per month!) in Las Vegas.
All of this is done under the banner of some fairly useful video how-tos and some less worthy content scraping from other websites….
The killer bits are that all the ‘blog’ entries are dated 24/9/2009 (apart from the odd one) and all the pages and how-tos are dated 24/7/2009!!!
Introduction I knew there was something really, really dodgy about that MyBookFace.net crap highlighted in this post the other day. Not only are they connected to some serious malware (as detailed in the posting), but they’ve an interesting line in popups!!! Google Treasure Chest Rises Yet Again! Here’s what to do… Go to http://mybookface.net making...
Introduction Poacher turned Gamekeeper I’ve been rss following a little thread where a job-seeking homeworker has been diddled out of thousands – see Saundrak’s Blog. It seems to have close ties to Pacific Webworks et al, maybe not directly, but the Golf Course, techniques, or something. Read this curious comment from someone called mlwood79 that...
Recently, Microsoft has reworked it’s search engine (MSN Live Search) and renamed it Bing. This was followed even more recently, with a joint venture between itself and former search king Yahoo! into a hazily explained search and advertising combination.
Microsoft is well known for wheeling out the lawyers as backup to it’s long-running scheming that batters any competition into the ground. I’m thinking particularly about the Netscape battle here…
Netscape, of course, although winning the final battle, lost the war and is no more. But it’s technical expertise re-surfaced as the Phoenix browser, whose modern name is Firefox.
An advertising and search war has been extant ever since Google shot to prominence because it… er… gave better search results! Microsoft has had umpteen attempts at catch up or smash down with the Google behemoth over the past decade. None have had any real effect. Likewise, Google has had umpteen attempts at rolling out profitable software to compete with Microsoft’s desktop dominance or Sun’s & HP’s mainframe business. The only success is their own system of networked mini-computers using open-source software – so this doesn’t count!
Below you’ll see the statistics globally, and also, as they hit this website, http://strangelyperfect.tv This is for comparison.
What’s clear is that the visitors to this website StrangelyPerfect.tv, have clearly different preferences to the global norm. In fact (much to my chagrin it has to be said), there’s a clear tilt towards Microsoft products compared to global usage ratios.
A. I don’t know!
What I do know is that the Bing results following search queries that finish at this website are on a par with the Google ones!
From my analysis of my (admittedly small) sample of website hits, I can categorically say that’s there’s now no difference between Google & Bing for general searching. I’ve proved this to myself with a few searches to corroborate this.
In this respect, Microsoft have done very well. How they’ve done this, I don’t know. But the similarities suggest similar logic at work on similar datasets. Whether industrial espionage is the reason or the more likely cause of parallel evolution, only time will tell.
Microsoft’s browser has come on leaps and bounds since development stopped at IE5/6 after they’d crushed Netscape out of existence (why develop new software when there is no competition?). Firefox has been the catalyst. It’s security, stability and user-friendly features have pushed it’s share right up. This forced Microsoft to react; first with the dreadfully slow IE7 and later with the much better IE8.
The in-built hysteresis of their desktop user base ensures that IE will be hard to beat. For myself, Firefox is still streets ahead, primarily because of it’s interface – the key features are sized and placed proportionately to their importance on the screen.
It’s just, right; that’s all.
My gut feeling is that we’ve reached a balance point now that will remain for a couple of years at least. Because the vast bulk of computer users are only just computer literate and ignorant of any alternatives, I can’t see any browser pushing past the Microsoft desktop domination to enable the displacement of IE from the 50-50 mark.
Weirdly, these are two battles of free against free. Browsers are free to use – as is internet search. It’s all about competing for advertising revenue in the end.
New Search Engine Last night I had a few hits from something called Bing but paid no attention to them. It turns out that it’s the new Microsoft search engine (see Guardian article here, guardian.co.uk…searchengines-microsoft), not just a revamped Live Search, apparently. In this article, much play is made on what ‘Bing’ actually means, quoting...
I’m not an expert on trademarks, but there’s an awful lot of similarity between the logo of the new Bing, Microsoft’s ‘new’ search engine, and Blinkx, the video search engine. Same font, same emphasis on a little dot…? Now, we know that there are only 26 letters in the English alphabet and only a few...
The Civil Service Rank and File Network have called a rally outside the PCS conference this week to demand action from the union on the vicious benefit sanctioning regime. Benefit sanctions are set to become a huge issue for public … Continue reading → […]
The Information Tribunal ordered the DWP to name the companies and charities involved in workfare at an appeal hearing this work. A long running war of words has been waging between the DWP and the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) ever … Continue reading → […]